
"Uncharted Legal Terrain: Trump's Post-Presidency Courtroom Battles"
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
This New York hush money conviction is currently subject to multiple appeals. Trump’s legal strategy has focused on attempting to move the case from state to federal court, arguing that the evidence and testimony involved official acts during his first term. According to OPB, his team cites a law allowing federal officials to transfer cases if the alleged misconduct occurred as part of official duties—though the District Attorney argues the crimes themselves happened while Trump was a candidate, not in office. A three-judge appeals panel recently heard arguments, grappling with the unprecedented situation of a former president convicted of a felony.
These appeals are unfolding alongside a broader legal calendar. Just Security and Lawfare report that Trump is also appealing decisions in his New York civil fraud case and contesting the handling of federal classified documents in Florida. In the classified documents case, a district judge in Florida dismissed the indictment on what Trump’s lawyers argued were grounds of improper appointment and funding of the special counsel. The government is appealing this dismissal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Trump’s legal prospects have been significantly reshaped by the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent rulings. SCOTUSblog notes that the Supreme Court held that former presidents have at least presumptive immunity for official acts, not private conduct, which could play a role in how Trump’s cases are handled going forward. The court’s decisions on the scope of presidential immunity and federal court authority have been seen as major victories for Trump, especially as legal questions about presidential powers and immunity remain unsettled.
Legal experts cite the extraordinary nature of these cases: never before has a U.S. president or former president faced such criminal liability, nor have the courts confronted the boundaries of presidential powers and immunities in this way. As courtrooms across the country continue to weigh Trump’s appeals and the future of these cases, the outcomes will likely set important legal precedents.
Thank you for tuning in. Come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.
Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs
For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai
No reviews yet