Nidhi Sachdeva from the University of Toronto talks about the science of learning, myth-busting educational misconceptions, and the role of technology in teaching. We get into cognitive load theory, explicit instruction, and question the efficacy of demanding reading loads in higher education. Nidhi shares her expertise on structured teaching methods, the importance of factual knowledge in the age of AI, and her efforts to simplify educational research for teachers. We tackle the perennial question of why most academic writing sucks, and talk about the best ways for practitioners to get started on their own research.

Dr. Nidhi Sachdeva is based at the University of Toronto’s Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE). She is interested in designing and integrating evidence-informed instructional practices. Recently, she has been researching this through the notion of microlearning and cognitive science. She developed a range of microlearning content using the science of learning as guidelines. You can find some of her work in the video series on How Learning Happens. She also developed the microlearning video series for peerScholar.

Nidhi’s substack, which she co authors with Jim Hewitt, is called The Science of Learning and is available at https://scienceoflearning.substack.com/. Nidhi and Jim have also appeared on the Chalk and Talk podcast, and Nidhi was a recent guest on the Progressively Incorrect podcast.

Further reading

• Kirschner, P. A., and Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
• Rosenshine, B. (2010), Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies that All Teachers Should Know. American Educator, 36 (1), 12-19.
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P. and Kauyga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory (Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies Book 1). London: Springer.
• Willingham, D. (2024). Professor of Psychology Daniel Willingham Speaks to UVA's Class of 2024. [Video]. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEhallt7ZCA [Accessed 20th October 2024].

This is the first of a series of conversations recorded last year with teachers from a range of disciplines who share an interest in applying scholarship to their own teaching, and conducting their own scholarly projects.

Today Lucy Turner-Voakes from the Academic Practice team and I sit down with Jeremy Moulton from Politics and Clément Moissard from Physics at the University of York. They explore how they integrate scholarship, teaching, and learning into their disciplines. Starting with their career journeys and projects, the discussion compares the teaching methodologies and the use of interdisciplinary practices to enhance their students' engagement. We talk about how to deal with awkward silences in seminars, the challenges and institutional support required for effective teaching scholarship, and many other topics.

Clement Moissard is a Teaching & Scholarship Associate Lecturer at the University of York's Plasma Institute where he teaches subjects ranging from Laser-Plasma interactions to Astrobiology.

Jeremy Moulton is a lecturer in the Department of Politics and International Relations. His primary interests are environmental politics, the European Union, and the scholarship of teaching and learning.

Pauldy Otermans and Stephanie Baines return to TELSIG to talk about the research and course design they've been carrying out at Brunel University. Building on the webinar they delivered back in May, Pauldy and Stephanie talk in detail about the challenges and triumphs of building an academic skills course that teaches students how to harness AI tools. As well as the practical applications and the importance of critical thinking, we discuss the collaborative efforts among faculty, and the evolving landscape of educational assessments.

View Stephanie and Pauldy's TELSIG webinar: https://youtu.be/jGjBms0m8Ks

Dr Pauldy Otermans is a Senior Lecturer (Education) in Psychology at Brunel and a female tech leader in the UK. She is a neuroscientist and psychologist by academic background and a female leader of AI technology. She is the Director of the Education Hub, Deputy Division Lead for Psychology, and Employability Lead for the Faculty. Dr Otermans’ research focuses on using AI in Education, Innovative Teaching & Learning in Higher Education.

Pauldy.Otermans@brunel.ac.uk

Dr Stephanie Baines is a Senior Lecturer (Education) in Psychology at Brunel. She is Associate Dean Quality Assurance and former Psychology UG Programme Lead. Previously she worked as a Lecturer in Psychology at Bangor University and the University of Manchester and as a Teaching Fellow at University College London. Dr Baines’ research focuses on Innovation in Teaching & Learning in Higher Education; Using AI in Education; Graduate outcomes & Employability; Student Engagement and Experience; EDI and Student Success; and Assessment and Feedback.

Stephanie.Baines@brunel.ac.uk

Today I'm talking to Dr Zoe Handley about her research on English tutors' knowledge and beliefs about the use of AI in language teaching. Zoe shares her background, starting as a language learner using technology, and details the evolution of speech and language technologies over the past 20 years. We elaborate on the potential of AI technologies in language learning apps like Duolingo and the ethical and practical challenges these technologies bring to assessment and pedagogy. The conversation also explores the gap between research and classroom practice and the exciting opportunities AI can offer in education, particularly in literacy and personalized learning.

Dr Zoe Handley is an applied linguist specialising in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) with experience in the speech AI industry. Her research explores how the affordances of digital technologies might be harnessed to create the conditions and engage learners in the processes we know promote language learning. Her most highly cited publications include a systematic review of the evidence for the use of technology to support (English) language learning and a tool for measuring teachers' knowledge of technology to support (English) language learning. She has also carried out a number of evaluations of specific technologies including collaborative writing platforms and chat applications.

Further reading Handley, Z. (2024). Has artificial intelligence rendered language teaching obsolete?. The Modern Language Journal.

I'm joined today by Dev Aditya of OIAI by Otermans Institute. We discuss the innovative use of small language models in education, the development and deployment of an AI teacher, and how AI can help to upscale marginalized communities. Dev shares insights into the challenges and opportunities of AI in education, the effectiveness of small language models, and the future of AI-integrated learning environments. He also touches on societal impacts, the balance between screen time and human interaction, and the fast-paced landscape of AI technology.

Dev Aditya is an AI expert from London, UK. He is currently the AI product lead and CEO at Otermans Institute, where he led the team that built the first Digital Human AI teacher (OIAI). He has conducted research in AI and HCI with The Alan Turing Institute and Brunel University London.

Watch Dev and Pauldy’s TELSIG webinar: https://youtu.be/Y5QcTg6cfj8

Register for trial access to the OIAI teacher showcased in the talk: https://forms.gle/J9t2hMijGCbJwzZz5

Contact details:

• Email: info@oiedu.co.uk
• Website: https://www.portfolio.oiedu.co.uk
• LinkedIn: / oiedu
• X: / otermans_edu
• Instagram: / oiedu19
• Medium: / beatricefromoiai

Join us for this episode of the TELSIG Podcast, where we delve, that’s right, delve, into the world of machine translation and its influence on education with Klaus Mundt and Michael Groves, who have been researching and writing on this topic since 2015. We explore the evolution of machine translation tools from Babel Fish to today's advanced AI models like ChatGPT. The discussion uncovers the ramifications for student voice, authenticity, academic integrity, and policy within educational contexts. Phil, Mike and Klaus discuss how these technologies are reshaping language learning processes, the ethical dilemmas they present, and the future of English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Tune in for an engaging conversation about balancing technological advancements with traditional language teaching, and fostering academic integrity in a rapidly changing educational landscape.

Further reading

Groves, M. and Mundt, K. (2015) Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes. Journal of English for Specific Purposes 37, pp.112-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2014.09.001

Mundt, K. And Groves, M. (2016) A double-edged sword: the merits and the policy implications of Google Translate in higher education. European Journal Of Higher Education 6:4, pp. 387-401. DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2016.1172248

Groves, M. and Mundt, K. (2021) ‘A ghostwriter in the machine? Attitudes of academic staff towards machine translation use in internationalised Higher Education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100957

Klaus Mundt is an Associate Professor at the University of Nottingham. He holds a PhD in Translation Studies, and his research interests focus on translation pedagogy and the use of machine translation in Higher Education. His main interest in teaching EAP on the ALACS programme is genre- and register-based language analysis and application, including subject-specific language. He is also involved in materials development and related studies such as genre and discourse analysis.

Michael Groves is Senior Lecturer at the Centre for English and Additional Languages at Lingnan University in Hong Kong. He has worked in the area of English Language Teaching for 30 years, and has specialised in English for Academic Purposes since 2007. He has worked in teaching and academic management roles in universities in the UK, China and Malaysia. He has also presented widely at conferences on a variety of topics. Mike’s research interests include student transition, with a particular interest in how students overcome “Academic Shock” when moving to a new place of study. He has also published on the use of online translation tools, and their impact on Internationalised Higher Education. In his free time, he enjoys running, cinema and wasting time on the Internet.

As teachers, we have access to literally millions of high quality, freely-availably images thanks to resources such as Pixabay and Unsplash. In this episode we dig into the impactful use of visual metaphors in teaching with guest Dr Richard Cotterill, who shares insights from his recent research. Rich argues that visual metaphors can make abstract concepts more comprehensible for students. We explore the challenges and benefits of incorporating images into lectures, the importance of simplifying content, and practical techniques for educators.

Richard Cotterill has been a teacher for over thirty years. He teaches Foundation Business and Pre-Masters Management to students in the University of York's International Pathway College and undertakes research into learning processes and assessment. Richard is a Fellow of the HEA, a Certified Management and Business Educator, a Certified Member of the Association for Learning Technology and holder of the Vice Chancellor’s Teaching Award.

Email: richard.cotterill@york.ac.uk

Related links

Cotterill, R. (2024). Unlocking meaning using visual metaphors. Forum Magazine. [Online]. Available at: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/staffhome/learningandteaching/documents/forum/Forum-Magazine-Issue-52-Spring-2024.pdf

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

E-authoring tools like Articulate Storyline and Adobe Captivate have had a transformative impact on education. They allow teachers and course writers to quickly create visually appealing, interactive learning materials. Despite these benefits, their uptake often remains restricted to small circles of enthusiasts.

Today I talk to David Read from the University of Sheffield about and the benefits and potential challenges faced by teachers in adopting these technologies. We talk through the benefits of interactive digital content, the evolution of teaching methodologies, and the critical role of training and support in successful technology integration. We also explore the use of AI in content creation and the future of educational technologies. Perfect for educators, learning designers, and technology enthusiasts seeking to enhance their teaching and learning processes. Finally, we discuss how teachers and materials writers can get started with their own digital projects.

David Read is Academic Director for Technology Enhanced Learning at the University of Sheffield. He has been involved in language teaching for over 20 years, and recently spearheaded the introduction of e-authoring tools in the language provision at Sheffield.

Resources:

https://www.articulate.com/360/storyline/

https://h5p.org/

https://www.xerte.org.uk/

https://wordwall.net/