Convicted Ex-Prez Trump's Legal Saga Rages On: Hush Money, Immunity, and High-Stakes Appeals cover art

Convicted Ex-Prez Trump's Legal Saga Rages On: Hush Money, Immunity, and High-Stakes Appeals

Convicted Ex-Prez Trump's Legal Saga Rages On: Hush Money, Immunity, and High-Stakes Appeals

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 Donald Trump is facing a complex web of court trials and legal maneuvers that have shaped headlines and national debate. At the center of these proceedings is his criminal conviction out of New York, where the former president was found guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records. This conviction was specifically connected to hush money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to secure her silence during the 2016 presidential campaign. As reported by NPR, Trump was sentenced only ten days before taking the presidential oath for a second term, receiving an unconditional discharge. That means he faced no fines or jail time, but the felony conviction remains on his record.

Throughout, Trump has consistently argued that the charges and the resulting conviction were unfair and politically motivated. During his sentencing, he addressed the court via video, maintaining his innocence. These stances have fed into ongoing appeals and legal efforts to overturn his conviction. Legal experts cited by NPR and OPB have noted the novelty and complexity of Trump's approach, as his lawyers seek to shift the conviction from the New York state system into the federal courts, arguing that some actions at issue overlapped with his presidential duties from his first term. The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, which prosecuted the case, is adamant that the matter remains squarely within state jurisdiction.

In June 2025, a federal appeals court in Manhattan heard arguments from Trump’s legal team, pressing to move the case under the Federal Officer Removal Statute, a law that allows federal officials to shift certain legal actions into federal court when their official actions are involved. Jeffrey Wall, Trump’s attorney and former acting solicitor general, asserted that testimony from former aides about actions during Trump’s presidency means the case belongs in federal court. Legal representatives for the DA’s office pushed back, emphasizing that the alleged crime itself—falsification of business records—was committed while Trump was a private citizen, not in federal office. The appeals court’s three-judge panel recognized the unprecedented nature of the situation, as the country has never before seen a sitting or former president convicted of a felony.

The legal battle is not confined to this hush money case. Lawfare reports that Trump is concurrently involved in appeals and ongoing litigation in several civil and criminal matters, including attempts to dismiss various cases or move them to different jurisdictions. Some of these cases have reached the Supreme Court, raising fundamental questions about presidential immunity and the legal boundaries between state and federal authority.

According to SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court recently handed Trump a major victory by recognizing presumptive immunity for former presidents when it comes to official acts. This decision has significant implications for both his legal defense strategies and the broader interpretation of executive power.

Listeners, the story surrounding Donald Trump’s legal challenges is evolving, with courtrooms and appeals continuing to play a pivotal role in his post-presidency era. Thank you for tuning in, and be sure to come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.

Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai
No reviews yet