
Tamerlane
Conqueror of the Earth
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for £18.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Charlton Griffin
-
By:
-
Harold Lamb
About this listen
With consummate skill, Tamerlane cobbled together a kingdom from the tattered leftovers of various Mongol fiefdoms. He then enlarged that fiefdom into a large and menacing power in the center of Asia. But when the mighty Mongolian empire decided to crush out this upstart rival, it was too late.
Tamerlane not only defeats the Mongols, but goes on to vanquish the Persians, the Indians and the mighty Ottoman Turks in successive wars. It was one of the most astounding developments imaginable, doubly so because of its swiftness and decisiveness. And at the time of his death in 1405, Tamerlane was on his way to invade and subdue China with an army of 200,000.
Ruling from his fabulous capital of Samarkand, he was a fascinating, controversial, and contradictory tyrant. He was both a destroyer and a builder, a barbarian and a cultured gentleman. He was ostensibly Muslim, but was the scourge of Muslim states, who vilify him to this day. The Tatar empire at his death approached the dimensions of the earlier Khans of Mongolia, yet it melted away immediately after his passing.
In yet another superb historical work, Harold Lamb brings the mighty Tatar leader to vivid life and shows how this ruthless commander used his superior intellect and magnetic leadership to overcome one obstacle after another. Tamerlane was truly one of the most remarkable personalities ever to emerge from the steppes of Central Asia.
©2007 Audio Connoisseur (P)2007 Audio Connoisseurheading is optional
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
story was ok. Does not justice to this conqueror.
Tamarlane
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Great narration
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
tamerlane = OK
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Part of the problem may be the age of the book. I don't know when it was written but it was clearly some time ago from certain references. However another problem is the reader. I have heard several books read by this guy, and just can't face any more. He speaks with an extremely posh accent, and I don't just mean he speaks well rather than 'common'. Some of his choices in pronunciation are very odd and for all I know they fit well in academic Oxbridge circles, but they just annoy the average reader.
So, would I recommend this book? Not particularly, although it may well be a fine study of a little-known subject. The sheer quantity of pointless fluff, and the highly irritating manner of the reader, are enough to make me think I could have made better use of my time.
Not an easy listen
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
it's bias or ignorance leads to these errors but both are unacceptable. fawning European references and condescending Islamic ones leads to me believe it must have been written during colonialism where everyone was a slightly less than a European.
i can't say Google would have helped this particular historian if it was around back then. As the saying goes 'all is yellow to the jaundiced eye"
Bias and poor history
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Timur led one of the bloodiest periods of human history with his thirst to be rival, if not outdo, Genghis Khan. This book completely ignores his victims, even going so far as to say that it disregards all accounts from the victims of Timur and only considers the chronicles of one of Timurs supporters as reliable. Timur did great, but terrible things, and to ignore this, and even go so far as to justify mass slaughter in the case of Christians (they apparently deserved to be slaughtered for rebelling against his rule), is despicable.
That last part is the only time he goes into some depth about Timur's bloodiness, the rest of the time he skirts around it by only talking about the destruction of buildings, which he then says was fine because Timur built new buildings in their place... Completely forgetting the killing side of sacking a city. Again, and again, he forgets to mention the victims story. Timur is one of the most deadliest leaders in history, rivalling 20th century dictators like Stalin in total, and ourdoing them in percentages. To ignore such a thing, and call those who mention is as unenlightened is wrong.
He could've swapped his chapter about how he would've owned the Europeans if he tried to invade them (claiming that Medieval Europeans had no concept of strategy and tactics - one of his many lies), with the perspective of his victims. He spends more time insulting Europeans, who had little direct contact with him, then he does with those he murdered and raped. He goes so far to claim all but one Asian historians fawn over Timur, and it's only because of Europeans he has a bad rap (another lie, all his victims were Asian... He had plenty of Asian haters)...
If you are about accuracy and ethical behaviour, don't give this huckster your cash.
Dishonest garbage
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.