Nihilism cover art

Nihilism

MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series

Preview
LIMITED TIME OFFER

3 months free
Try for £0.00
£8.99/mo thereafter. Renews automatically. Terms apply. Offer ends 31 July 2025 at 23:59 GMT.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for £8.99/mo after 3 months. Cancel monthly.

Nihilism

By: Nolen Gertz
Narrated by: Shaun Grindell
Try for £0.00

£8.99/mo after 3 months. Offer ends 31 July 2025 23:59 GMT. Cancel monthly.

Buy Now for £12.99

Buy Now for £12.99

Confirm Purchase
Pay using card ending in
By completing your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and authorise Audible to charge your designated card or any other card on file. Please see our Privacy Notice, Cookies Notice and Interest-based Ads Notice.
Cancel

About this listen

When someone is labeled a nihilist, it's not usually meant as a compliment. Most of us associate nihilism with destructiveness and violence. Nihilism means, literally, "an ideology of nothing". Is nihilism, then, believing in nothing? Or is it the belief that life is nothing? Or the belief that the beliefs we have amount to nothing? If we can learn to recognize the many varieties of nihilism, Nolen Gertz writes, then we can learn to distinguish what is meaningful from what is meaningless. In this addition to the MIT Press Essential Knowledge series, Gertz traces the history of nihilism in Western philosophy from Socrates through Hannah Arendt and Jean-Paul Sartre.

Although the term "nihilism" was first used by Friedrich Jacobi to criticize the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Gertz shows that the concept can illuminate the thinking of Socrates, Descartes, and others. It is Nietzsche, however, who is most associated with nihilism, and Gertz focuses on Nietzsche's thought. Gertz goes on to consider what is not nihilism - pessimism, cynicism, and apathy - and why; he explores theories of nihilism; he considers nihilism as a way of understanding aspects of everyday life; and he reflects on the future of nihilism. We need to understand nihilism not only from an individual perspective, Gertz tells us, but also from a political one.

©2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (P)2019 Gildan Media
History Philosophy Socialism Capitalism

Listeners also enjoyed...

The Antichrist, Ecce Homo cover art
Fear and Trembling cover art
The Little Book of Humanism cover art
The Fyodor Dostoevsky BBC Radio Drama Collection cover art
In the Dust of This Planet cover art
Kant cover art
Loving Life: The Morality of Self-Interest and the Facts That Support It cover art
Simply Dirac cover art
Money, Sex, War, Karma cover art
You Are Not Your Own cover art
Star Wars and Philosophy: More Powerful than You Can Possibly Imagine cover art
To Have or to Be? cover art
A Political Philosophy cover art
Mini Philosophy cover art
Philosophy cover art
Planet Hurt, Volume One cover art
All stars
Most relevant  
Listened to this to see if a more scholarly look into nihilism would eradicate any misconceptions I may have had regarding nihilism being something predominantly experienced by young angry men (such as myself, many years ago), and the perceived influence I see nihilism having culturally at this current time.

The first half of this book was informative in it's own way, and generally provided a neutral narrative tone throughout this section. As it's an audiobook I can't go back and find the precise quotation but I recall the author stating quite clearly that nihilism basically means having politic viewpoints is (unsurprisingly, considering the title of the book) pointless, or some other phrase. This however is completely contradicted in the latter half when the very typical, Marxist / anarcho-communist bias emerges in the second half (anyone who ever went to university knows precisely what I'm talking about).

In summary, despite actively looking to dispel my preconceptions, they were actively reinforced. Nihilism probably does have something to offer people, but only people operating at a significantly higher developmental stage than 95% of the population, and its internal contradictions render it useless as an ideology in practical application, in my not-formally-philosophically-educated opinion.

The second half contradicts the first.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.