
King Arthur’s Wars
The Anglo-Saxon Conquest of England
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy Now for £15.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Julian Elfer
-
By:
-
Jim Storr
About this listen
The story of an era shrouded in mystery, and the gradual changing of a nation's cultural identity.
We speak English today, because the Anglo-Saxons took over most of post-Roman Britain. How did that happen? There is little evidence: not much archaeology, and even less written history. There is, however, a huge amount of speculation. King Arthur's Wars brings an entirely new approach to the subject - the answers are out there, in the British countryside, waiting to be found.
Months of field work and map study allow us to understand, for the first time, how the Anglo-Saxons conquered England, county by county and decade by decade.
King Arthur's Wars exposes what the landscape and the place names tell us. As a result, we can now know far more about this "Dark Age." What is so special about Essex? Why is Buckinghamshire an odd shape? Why is the legend of King Arthur so special to us? Why don't Cumbrian farmers use English numbers when they count sheep? Why don't we know where Camelot was? Why did the Romano-British stop eating oysters? This book provides a new level of understanding of the centuries preceding the Norman Conquest.
©2016, 2018 Jim Storr (P)2019 TantorSurprising Read!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
fascinating insight
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Covers ground that other books on this era don't
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Very informative and interesting.
Superb study
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
As to the correctness of his theories I don't know enough about the period in question to even hazard a guess , however I suspect his 'soldiers eye' is probably more right than it is wrong. He certainly presents a very rational and well thought out case and his theories deserve far more attention from other scholars than google would lead me to suspect they have had.
He posits that Camelot was infact Colchester (Gawd help us all!) and on that point he , not being a Dr of medieval lit, he needed to back up his claims with evidence from philologists and other experts. Again I suspect he may be right but he is well outside his academic comfort zone on that one.
He could also use some help in composing his narrative . As another reviewer says ' if I have to listen to the * exact * measurements of yet another dyke'.
But all-in-all a rewarding listen and I have certainly learnt something from it. He needs to borrow Michael Wood's jacket and helicopter and do a TV series!
Good Listening -and that's its biggest flaw.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Tedious
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.